Editor in Chief
Reviewer Roles and Responsibilities
The reviewer should avoid personal comments or criticism for an article submitted.
A reviewer should maintain the confidentiality of the review process by not disclosing information of the reviewed paper without permission from the editorial office.
A reviewer should determine originality, credit, and scope of the work and need to suggest a number of ways to improve it so that it highlights the quality of the article.
A reviewer should give his/her comments in an unbiased manner following the ethical rules.
A reviewer should take a concern from the editor before rejecting/accepting an article.
A reviewer should ensure that published articles meet the scope of SciFed Publishers respectively.
A reviewer should not use/disclose any unpublished work/ arguments/ interpretations of a submitted manuscript for his/her own work, but with consent from the author.
Reviewers should agree to review the manuscript if and only if they have expertise in the subject area.
Reviewers should openly declare any potential conflict of interests and take assistance from the Editor regarding any uncertain conflicts.
Reviewers should declare and disagree to review the manuscript if they are involved in the submitted work in any manner.
Reviewers should notify the Editor, if the manuscript has already reviewed by them before in other journal and seek guidance whether to carry further or not.
Reviewers should immediately notify the Editor if they found plagiarized or infringed content in the manuscript, which he has to review.
Reviewers should not attempt to contact the authors before the article is published without the permission of the Editor.
All articles will be published for 199 US Dollars/article, if and only if the article is accepted to publish.
Keynote Speakers for the Scientific Federation Conferences will be invited from the Review Board Members, where he/she will get special discounts (40%) for the registration fee.
Reviewers will be awarded with reviewer Credits at the end of the year.
Editors will reward the best reviewer award based on their review quality for every year, which will be displayed in the website.
Reviewers can also propose the benefit that they intend to get through their collaboration with the journal.
Based on their review quality they will also be promoted to editorial board, especially if they have
Copyrights and Licensing
Terms and Conditions
Incidence and Risk Factors Rel Read More...
Definition of Old Age in Arabi Read More...
Palliative Care in Croatia
Alternatives and Solutions for Read More...
Enhancing The Quality of Geria Read More...